To: Stewie-baby
From: Gerald L. Atkinson <atkinson@newtotalitarians.com>
Subject: Part VI Response to Your BLAST in defense of Mike Stapleton
Cc: HollowForceDebate
Bcc:
X-Attachments:

Stewie-baby,
    I want to thank you and your friends for participating in our heated conversations over the past six weeks. I must admit that I have learned a great deal from this interaction. That is what was intended.

    You see, I am conducting research for a new book which should be published in late 2001 or early 2002. The tentative title is, "The 'Socialization' of the U.S. Military."  It will have the same flavor as the report that I published for the Internet, "Sensitivity Training and the 'Socialization' of the U.S. Military."

    The latter resulted from extensive research into the connection between the 're-education' techniques used on our Korean War POWs and the 'sensitivity' training that has been forced on military personnel over the past eight years by Executive fiat. These techniques had been introduced into our universities and K-12 public schools, gradually, over the past 30 years. This powerful behavior modification tool has been mandated for the military by the civilian foot soldiers of the 'cultural Marxist' Frankfurt School intellectuals. These counter-culture revolutionaries, the 'power elites' of the Boomer generation, forced these techniques on the military  with the help of an 'unknowing,' weak, and compliant flag-rank military leadership.


    I have written extensively on this subject. Interestingly enough, these techniques were developed (in parallel with the Soviets and Brits) by Kurt Lewin in the U.S. during the 1940s. Our brand of 'sensitivity training' is exactly the same in technique as the Chinese brand used on our Korean War POWs. You can download an article published in The Washington Times ("Military moral imperative," FORUM, 2/13/00) from my Web Site at:


                                                                      http://www.newtotalitarians.com

if you wish to learn more on this subject. Go to the Newspaper Articles link and click on FORUM 2-13-00.

    For those of you who wish a summary, here it is. "The drastic plunge in morale during the 1990s is directly linked to a purging of real 'warriors' from the armed forces. This purge started in the aftermath of the Tailhook '91 scandal and continues today as we consciously 'feminize' our once proud, strong military."

    "The techniques used to corrupt and passify our officer corps are quite similar to the indoctrination techniques used by the Chinese on captured American GIs during the Korean War."

    "Allegedly, the mostly young, poorly trained and uneducated GIs performed questionably during their imprisonment by the Chinese. The alleged misconduct by captured GIs is recorded in the extensive de-briefings of the soldiers upon their return. These reports describe the 'indoctrination' or 're-education' methods used by the Chinese."


    "Today, our senior military leadership doesn't recognize that this approach is being used to gain acceptance of the 'feminization' of our nation's combat arms. Regardless, these high-ranking military leaders are morally responsible for their failure to resist. In the face of our knowledge of the Korean War POW experience, they have no excuse for their lack of resistance."


    "Most Americans have not yet recognized that these methods are morally corrupt. These techniques, applied by the Chinese, worked on our Korean War POWs. According to the best data available: Only 5 percent resisted the enemy indoctrination; 15 percent were consistent,dedicated, hard-core collaborators with the enemy; the other 80 percent were rendered 'passive' by their captors' 'sensitivity training' methods and stood for nothing but their own survival."


    "The Chinese indoctrination methods are strikingly similar to the methods now incorporated in the 'sensitivity training' that is given to our military personnel by professional 'facilitators.' What do we learn from the Korean War POW experience?

1) We learn that small, peer pressure encounter groups -- using 'sensitivity training' techniques -- are very effective in breaking resistance to conform to another's will.
2) We learn that those 80 percent of individuals who were rendered 'passive' under the enemy's indoctrination program had little knowledge of our country's history, heritage, and unique place in the panorama of nations in history.
3) We learn that many of those young men (18 to 24 years old) were simply not hardened to the real world.
4) We learn that many of those in the passive 80 percent were not their brother's keeper."

    "Unfortunately, 'sensitivity training' and feminization efforts throughout the armed forces are successfully separating members from the morals they need to resist such re-education efforts. When junior officers see this on a daily basis is it no wonder that the armed forces cannot keep these young, mid-grade officers -- even by offering sizable bonuses for staying?"


    So, Stewie-baby, how does all of this affect you and those on your list?  Many of us who have fought our nation's past wars are wondering about you guys. Given that these 'sensitivity training' techniques have been used on our armed forces over the past eight years to promote the 'feminization' and open 'homosexualization' of our military, there are questions. Are you and your guys resisters, collaborators, or have you been rendered 'passive?'  There are no other categories.


    For those of you who have had your first command, did you schedule and allow 'facilitators' to carry out 'sensitivity training' on your officers and men on the above topics?  If so, did you know the origin of this behavior modification technique? If you did resist, was this resistance sufficiently overt to be noticed by those over whom you held command?


    Look, we know that many outstanding young leaders have not been purged from naval aviation. How do we know that? Many retired naval aviators (including quite a number of flag-rank officers) have sons who are still on active duty. We know from conversations with these people that they have counseled their sons to 'stay the course' and be ready when their time comes to make the necessary changes to the damage that has been wrought during the '90s. And this counsel has been given in the face of many times when the son just wanted to 'chuck it' when the social engineering pressures became so great and so patently obvious to all. And I am talking about sons who were in their first 'commands.' We know that these guys are the 'good guys' in this story. They are out there. They exist. They are just keeping their heads down, gritting their teeth, and doing the best they can to survive under the circumstances. And they may just be waiting for their chance to 'do the right thing.' Many of you may be in that category. If so, the Navy of the future depends on your courage, resolve, and good judgment.


    But we also know that there are a number of people, presumably also some among you on this cc: list, who have swallowed the radical feminist agenda hook, line, and sinker. Naval officers who have become 'collaborators.' People who are carrying out the radical feminist agenda willingly, forcefully, and with vigor. Some may be carrying out the current social engineering for career purposes. Some may be actually swayed by the radical feminists' arguments and behavior control techniques. These are the people who are a danger to the Navy, the U.S. military, and to American civilization. These are the ones, presumably, who will remain after the 'purge,' if it succeeds.


    So, which category best describes you?  Are you a resister? Or are you a collaborator?  Or have you been rendered 'passive' as 80 percent of the Korean War POWs were to the 'sensitivity training' imposed on them by their Chinese captors -- essentially rendered incapable of leading the charge against their captors' destructive 're-education' program, conducted using the latest and very effective behavior modification techniques?


    I am vastly encouraged by the number of you on the cc: list who have forwarded our conversations to your friends. This has resulted in over 2,000 hits on my Web Site since we started the discussion six weeks ago. And I know these people have sufficient interest to have downloaded some of my essays, newspaper articles, and other commentary. This suggests that many of you (and your friends) are of the resister category. That is, indeed, encouraging.


    So, let me make a final offer to those of you (and your many friends) who may find something useful in all of this. This offer should also drive a stake in the heart of the jibe that I am on this crusade for the sake of money.

    I will send, FREE OF CHARGE, a copy of the following to anyone who sends an e-mail requesting same along with a return mailing address. I pledge to keep any such information in the strictest of confidence. You may choose among the following or request ALL.


  • The book, "From Trust to Terror: Radical Feminism is Destroying the U.S. Navy."

  • The audio tape, "Mind Control: The Ultimate Weapon." This is a lecture by Major WM. Mayer, USA, who interrogated Korean War POWs after their repatriation. It describes the 'sensitivity training' imposed on them by their Chinese captors. Does any of this sound familiar?

  • The video tape (60 minutes), "From Tailhook '91 to Karl Marx '99." This is a conference-quality video of a speech I gave to the Doctors for Disaster Preparedness in Seattle, WA on 6/5/99. It records my PUBLIC defense of naval aviators and naval aviation during and after the Tailhook '91 fiasco. It also reveals the evidence (a memo from ADM Charles Larson and a prize-winning 'ethics' essay by a Midshipman 3/C) of a destructive new 'ethics' program at the U.S. Naval Academy.

  • The audio tape (90 minutes), "Where Have All the Warriors Gone?" This cassette describes the 'purge' going on in the U.S. Navy as a result of the radical feminist agenda and the damage it is doing to morale. It contains interviews with two radio talk show hosts, one a young man who is the son of an Air Force combat veteran and one a woman who was a radical activist in her youth in the '60s who has since converted to an opposite view of the world.

  • The audio tape (two hours), "Who Will Win America's Future Wars?' This talk show program, hosted by Ken Bagwell of WTZY-880 in Asheville, NC, features RADM C.A. 'Mark' Hill Jr. USN (Ret.) and me discussing the topics that have been reviewed during the conversations you and I have been conducting via e-mail.

  • The video tape (50 minutes), "Political correctness: Where does it come from and how does it affect you?" This nationally televised talk show, hosted by a military analyst and a political activist, reveals that the virus that has infected America's campuses and public life has a definite origin -- the Frankfurt School intellectuals who immigrated to America in 1933, migrated to several leading universities (Columbia, Princeton, Brandeis, and the U of California at Berkeley), and became the intellectual foundation for the counter-culture revolution of the mid-1960s. Herbert Marcuse (Make Love, Not War) is one of the most well-known.

    This material, valued at well over $75.00, is offered to you FREE of charge (including postage) for nothing more from you than an expression of interest. I offer it for your enlightenment on the matters discussed and as a counter to the baseless charge that I am '...in this only for the money.'


Best Regards,

Beak